Why should we trust your “no hidden agenda” promise Mr. Harper?

This is really rich. After telling anyone who will listen that he doesn’t trust Michael Ignatieff’s promise not to form a coalition, now Stephen Harper wants us to believe him when he says he has no hidden agenda and won’t reopen socially-conservative issues if he wins his much coveted majority.

Harper lied about taxing trust funds, he lied about patronage appointments to the Senate, he continues to spread lies by falsely claiming that a coalition would be illegitimate, and yet now he wants us to take him at his word about not having a hidden agenda.

Good luck with that message.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Canadian election

Stephen Harper is lowering Canada’s status as a defender of human rights

This should be another of the many reasons why Canada can no longer afford to have Stephen Harper as our Prime Minister.

Leave a Comment

Filed under human rights, Stephen Harper

Tough guy Harper is scared of the press

In the latest example of the many similarities between Stephen Harper and former president George Bush, Harper is strictly choreographing who he talks to on the campaign trail. Just like Bush, he never takes open questions; everyone he “meets” has been pre-screened.

What’s more, Harper is limiting the media to just four questions a day? Here’s one: Mr. Harper, if you’re so confident in your policies and your personality, why are you so terrified of the press?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Stephen Harper

Is Harper running scared of Ignatieff?

Sure looks like it, given Harper’s complete flip-flop on debating Michael Ignatieff one on one.

On Wednesday Harper talked a big game, asking for a head to head debate. Ignatieff immediately responded by saying he’d debate Harper “anytime, any place.”

Less than a day later, Harper is backing out, and he looks incredibly lame in the process. For someone who likes to play the role of a tough guy, he comes across as a whining weakling for his instant reversal.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Michael Ignatieff, Stephen Harper

Enough with the coalition talk already…

Rather than debating issues of substance and import, Stephen Harper insists on talking about the “coalition.”

This was bogus and hypocritical for three very important reasons:

1.) Harper kicked the tires on a coalition back in 2004, so he looks incredibly hypocritical in his current scaremongering about something he was quite happy to do when he was in opposition. (Note to his handlers: if there is video of him sitting with his coalition partners – which there is- perhaps it’s not such a great idea to bring up threats of coalitions.

2) There is nothing even remotely immoral or illegal about coalitions, no matter what Harper says. It is written very clearly in our parliamentary code; Harper knows that but is counting on the average Canadian to not know better.

3) Three western countries, including Harper’s beloved Israel, are currently run by coalitions (Britain and Australia being the other two.) If those countries can function with coalition governments, so can Canada.

Surprisingly, the National Post wrote an editorial yesterday entitled “Next issue please.” To no one’s surprise the PR arm of the Conservative party took it easy on Harper when it should have come down harder on Harper’s incessant and hypocritical invocation of the threats of a coalition. But at least it forced the issue of moving on to more important issues.

Here’s hoping Stephen Harper will listen to his close friends at the Post and get past his fixation on coalitions and move on to more important issues.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Canadian election, Stephen Harper

Is Canada a liberal or a conservative country?

The Globe’s Jeffrey Simpson has a fascintating post today, where he points out that while conservatives have never been better organized nor better financed, they still only hover at about the 36% popularity level that Joe Clark enjoyed in 1979. His conclusion is that Canada is no more conservative now, despite all that Harper and the Conservatives have accomplished in the last five years, than it was 30 years ago. In some ways Simpson is right, but in some powerful ways he is very wrong.

Simpson:

Conservatives have learned – some might say they now relish – the black arts of shameless politics, what with attack ads, using government money to promote the government’s agenda, making announcements all over the place, and spin-doctoring every waking hour. Conservatives have a political machine that is better focused, more coherent and more ruthless than anything their adversaries possess, or perhaps than Canadian politics has ever seen.

The Conservatives have tried everything these past five years to influence public opinion in its favour, buoyed by the many conservative forces in civil society that have never been stronger. And yet, the country, taken as a whole, is not more politically Conservative than it was. And therein lies the conundrum and presumably the frustration for today’s conservatives.

Conservatives have learned – some might say they now relish – the black arts of shameless politics, what with attack ads, using government money to promote the government’s agenda, making announcements all over the place, and spin-doctoring every waking hour. Conservatives have a political machine that is better focused, more coherent and more ruthless than anything their adversaries possess, or perhaps than Canadian politics has ever seen.

The Conservatives have tried everything these past five years to influence public opinion in its favour, buoyed by the many conservative forces in civil society that have never been stronger. And yet, the country, taken as a whole, is not more politically Conservative than it was. And therein lies the conundrum and presumably the frustration for today’s conservatives.

Simpson may be correct that the country isn’t any more conservative; but the same cannot be said of Ottawa. The problem is that our government, policies and our global reputation are significantly more conservative than ever before, much moreso than when Brian “I don’t see anything wrong with taking envelopes of cash” Mulroney won his big majorities. Harper has undeniably managed to lurch the country further to the right, even though the poll numbers hover around that 36% mark.

The huge issue for Canadians is the prospect of how much further Harper would pull Canada to the right if he ever got his majority.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Canadian election, Uncategorized

Post’s Lorne Gunter calls for honesty from opposition but not from the government

This is really rich. At a time when Stephen Harper’s Conservatives are the first political party in Canadian history to be held in contempt of parliament for their secrecy, the National Post’s Lorne Gunter is really hoping the opposition parties will come clean about any coalition plans.

If there was even a shred of consistency in his writing, Gunter would have a point, but because he hasn’t demanded the same kind of honesty of the government that he is now demanding to see in the opposition, Gunter is displaying a rather astonishing level of hypocrisy.

Think about the idealogical blinders you need to be wearing when you demand the other team be honest while your own team is the most secretive in Canadian political history.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Conservative hypocrisy